Wisconsin AG vs. a Lyme Doctor

OK, So it was Lyme Awareness Month in Wisconsin... Great.. However, at the same time, one of the attorneys in the Wisconsin's Attorney General's office starts an attack on a doctor who was successfully treating Lyme patients... The attack on Dr. Hoffman seems fuzzy and suspicious at best.

The link to the initial article is at http://www.publichealthalert.org./text1.htm The actual story is a PDF at http://www.publichealthalert.org./Wisconsin%20Lyme%20Doctor%20Under%20Fire%20During%20Governor.pdf

To sum up the story, it appears that the good old doc is a generous, dedicated doctor. He refused to prescribe narcotics to a patient who then went to the Wisconsin AG's office. The prosecutor is a guy named Arthur Thexton who is well known for prosecuting "alternative medicines" - (more about that later). ... Thexton then started demanding records related to treating Lyme patients.. When his office started getting innundated with out of state calls, he then tried to claim that the treatment of Lyme disease was not the issue.

By the way, there is a legal defense fund for Dr. Hoffman

contributing to Dr. Hoffmann’s legal defense fund, please contact PJ
Langhoff at info@sewill.org

Hey Wisconsin - If this is your idea of how to celebrate "lyme awareness month", why don't you just breed a couple of million infected ticks and release them??


Let's look at this a little more closely... Year after year, legislation that would allow for more aggressive treatment for Lyme dies in the Pennsylvania legislature (they did find time to give themselves and their judge friends a huge illegal pay raise though)... Why would state governments not want to provide the best treatment for people suffering from this disease? Here are a couple of thoughts...

• The insurance companies want to control cash disbursements. Lyme can be expensive to treat, especially the long term, chronic cases
• The insurance companies have lobbyists in the state house and often are substantial contributors to legislator's campaigns.
• Lyme is primarily a suburban and rural issue right now. Those areas don't always have the voting clout of urban areas.
• Those afflicted with Lyme don't yet have the political power associated with advocates for some other diseases such as aids and breast cancer.

If you do a little research into Arthur Thexton, you come up with some other interesting aspects of his career.

• http://alkalizeforhealth.net/Lquackwatch4.htm is a scathing article about the way that Thexton's office handled the case of Stuart Suster. There are some pretty serious allegations there against Thexton backed up by the fact that Suster is now suing Thexton in Federal Court. The tone of that article can be summed up in the following quote.

Health Insurance companies, I’m sure you already know, do not want to pay for
services rendered by health professionals. If they pay at all, they pay a small
percentage of the billing. They especially don’t want to pay for new things –
and, of course, if a New York ad agency (quackbuster management) rails against
it – health insurance companies will eagerly leap into non-payment mode.

The issue is that we need a lot more research into Lyme disease. Research that is not restricted by what the insurance companies would like to see, but rather into what treatments are really effective for those people suffering from this disease. Once there is a solid set of verifiable, established evidence as to what will really work then overzealous prosecutors will not be able to intimidate those trying to provide treatment. The current environment where groups are pushing for minimal treatment for Lyme will simply cause a lot more suffering for those infected.